From 732c66eceb0dc71e405579c9dd86709129302316 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Folkert van Heusden <mail@vanheusden.com>
Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2025 08:22:22 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] sim_interval would make tests fail

---
 PDP11/test.c | 4 +++-
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/PDP11/test.c b/PDP11/test.c
index e22888e5..fb2457ce 100644
--- a/PDP11/test.c
+++ b/PDP11/test.c
@@ -18,6 +18,7 @@ extern int32 PSW;
 extern t_stat cpu_reset(DEVICE *dptr);
 extern DEVICE cpu_dev;
 extern int32 STACKFILE[4];
+extern int32 sim_interval;
 
 struct mem_t {
 	uint32_t addr;
@@ -39,7 +40,7 @@ int n_test_values = 0;
 
 void generate_test_values()
 {
-	for(int i=1; i<65536; i+=10) {
+	for(int i=1; i<65536; i+=14) {
 		if (is_prime(i))
 			test_values[n_test_values++] = i;
 	}
@@ -149,6 +150,7 @@ void init_simh()
 {
 	// reset_all(0);  is this required?
 	cpu_reset(&cpu_dev);
+	sim_interval = 32767;
 }
 
 void randomize_registers_all_values()