From dbed84c370ecb267fd9780f6f0db7fddd16eb744 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Mark Pizzolato <mark@infocomm.com>
Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2016 14:43:12 -0800
Subject: [PATCH] PDP11: Fix PCLK device to properly behave with a 0 value
 interval (65536)

Also migrate to usecs remaining API to simplify producing the remaining
interval value.
---
 PDP11/pdp11_pclk.c | 4 +++-
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/PDP11/pdp11_pclk.c b/PDP11/pdp11_pclk.c
index 0c6553de..7fb7b7cf 100644
--- a/PDP11/pdp11_pclk.c
+++ b/PDP11/pdp11_pclk.c
@@ -274,6 +274,8 @@ else {
     uint32 delay = DMASK & ((pclk_csr & CSR_UPDN) ? (DMASK + 1 - val) : val);
     int32 rv;
 
+    if (delay == 0)
+        delay = DMASK + 1;
     rv = CSR_GETRATE (pclk_csr);                        /* get rate */
     sim_activate_after (&pclk_unit, xtim[rv] * delay);  /* schedule interrupt */
     }
@@ -288,7 +290,7 @@ if (!sim_is_active (&pclk_unit))
     return pclk_ctr;
 
 rv = CSR_GETRATE (pclk_csr);                            /* get rate */
-val = (uint32)((sim_activate_time (&pclk_unit) / sim_timer_inst_per_sec ()) * (1000000 / xtim[rv]));
+val = (uint32)((sim_activate_time_usecs (&pclk_unit) / xtim[rv]));
 val &= DMASK;
 if (pclk_csr & CSR_UPDN) 
     val = DMASK + 1 - val;