- Limit choices to explicitly either G-FLOAT or D-FLOAT for SET CPU INST=
- Compile in all instruction implementations and dynamically use the
enabled ones.
- Different VAX models had different groups of instructions which were
implemented in hardware vs trappng to the OS for emulation. Functionality
has been added to differentiate the various mix of instruction groups for
different models and to display both the groups and the actual instructions.
- Visibility to Instruction groups is provided by SHOW CPU INSTRUCTIONS
and the list of the active instructions implemented and emulated via
SHOW CPU -V INSTRUCTIONS.
- The MicroVAX I CPU handled some execution fault conditions differently
from other VAX systems these differences are now specifically handled.
- Add build time test support to MicroVAX I running EHKAA v1.13
suggested in #683
- Add more CPU debug details relating to exception and interrupt processing
These changes facilitate more robust parameter type checking and helps
to identify unexpected coding errors.
Most simulators can now also be compiled with a C++ compiler without
warnings.
Additionally, these changes have also been configured to facilitate easier
backporting of simulator and device simulation modules to run under the
simh v3.9+ SCP framework.
The goals here being to simplify calling code while getting consistent output delivered everywhere it may be useful.
Modified most places which explicitly used sim_log or merely called printf to now avoid doing that and merely call sim_printf().
Design Notes for Fixing VAX Unaligned Access to IO and Register Space
Problem Statement: VAX unaligned accesses are handled by reading the
surrounding longword (or longwords) and
a) for reads, extracting the addressed addressed word or longword
b) for writes, inserting the addressed word or longword and then
writing the surrounding longword (or longwords) back
This is correct for all memory cases. On the 11/780, the unaligned
access to register or IO space causes an error, as it should. On
CVAX, it causes incorrect behavior, by either performing too many
QBus references, or performing read-modify-writes instead of pure
writes, or accessing the wrong Qbus locations.
The problem cannot be trivially solved with address manipulation.
The core issues is that on CVAX, unaligned access is done to
exactly as many bytes as are required, using a base longword
address and a byte mask. There are five cases, corresponding to
word and longword lengths, and byte offsets 1, 2 (longword only),
and 3. Further, behavior is different for reads and writes, because
the Qbus always performs word operations on reads, leaving it to
the processor to extract a byte if needed.
Conceptual design: Changes in vax_mmu.c:
Unaligned access is done with two separate physical addresses, pa
and pa1, because if the access crosses a page boundary, pa1 may
not be contiguous with pa. It's worth noting that in an unaligned
access, the low part of the data begins at pa (complete with byte
offset), but the high parts begins at pa1 & ~03 (always in the
low-order end of the second longword).
To handle unaligned data, we will add two routines for read and
write unaligned:
data = ReadU (pa, len);
WriteU (pa, len, val);
Note that the length can be 1, 2, or 3 bytes. For ReadU, data is
return right-aligned and masked. For WriteU, val is expected to
be right-aligned and masked.
The read-unaligned flows are changed as follows:
if (mapen && ((off + lnt) > VA_PAGSIZE)) { /* cross page? */
vpn = VA_GETVPN (va + lnt); /* vpn 2nd page */
tbi = VA_GETTBI (vpn);
xpte = (va & VA_S0)? stlb[tbi]: ptlb[tbi]; /* access tlb */
if (((xpte.pte & acc) == 0) || (xpte.tag != vpn) ||
((acc & TLB_WACC) && ((xpte.pte & TLB_M) == 0)))
xpte = fill (va + lnt, lnt, acc, NULL); /* fill if needed */
pa1 = ((xpte.pte & TLB_PFN) | VA_GETOFF (va + 4)) & ~03;
}
else pa1 = ((pa + 4) & PAMASK) & ~03; /* not cross page */
bo = pa & 3;
if (lnt >= L_LONG) { /* lw unaligned? */
sc = bo << 3;
wl = ReadU (pa, L_LONG - bo); /* read both fragments */
wh = ReadU (pa1, bo); /* extract */
return ((wl | (wh << (32 - sc))) & LMASK);
}
else if (bo == 1) /* read within lw */
return ReadU (pa, L_WORD);
else {
wl = ReadU (pa, L_BYTE); /* word cross lw */
wh = ReadU (pa1, L_BYTE); /* read, extract */
return (wl | (wh << 8));
}
These are not very different, but they do reflect that ReadU returns
right-aligned and properly masked data, rather than the encapsulating
longword.
The write-unaligned flows change rather more drastically:
if (mapen && ((off + lnt) > VA_PAGSIZE)) {
vpn = VA_GETVPN (va + 4);
tbi = VA_GETTBI (vpn);
xpte = (va & VA_S0)? stlb[tbi]: ptlb[tbi]; /* access tlb */
if (((xpte.pte & acc) == 0) || (xpte.tag != vpn) ||
((xpte.pte & TLB_M) == 0))
xpte = fill (va + lnt, lnt, acc, NULL);
pa1 = ((xpte.pte & TLB_PFN) | VA_GETOFF (va + 4)) & ~03;
}
else pa1 = ((pa + 4) & PAMASK) & ~03;
bo = pa & 3;
if (lnt >= L_LONG) {
sc = bo << 3;
WriteU (pa, L_LONG - bo, val & insert[L_LONG - bo]);
WriteU (pa, bo, (val >> (32 - sc)) & insert[bo]);
}
else if (bo == 1) /* read within lw */
WriteU (pa, L_WORD, val & WMASK);
else { /* word cross lw */
WriteU (pa, L_BYTE, val & BMASK);
WriteU (pa, L_BYTE, (val >> 8) & BMASK);
}
return;
}
Note that all the burden here has been thrown on the WriteU routine.
-------------
ReadU is the simpler of the two routines that needs to be written.
It will handle memory reads and defer register and IO space to
model-specific unaligned handlers.
int32 ReadU (uint32 pa, int32 lnt)
{
int32 dat;
int32 sc = (pa & 3) << 3;
if (ADDR_IS_MEM (pa))
dat = M[pa >> 2];
else {
mchk = REF_V;
if (ADDR_IS_IO (pa))
dat = ReadIOU (pa, lnt);
else dat = ReadRegU (pa, lnt);
}
return ((dat >> sc) & insert[lnt]);
}
Note that the ReadIOU and ReadRegU return a "full longword," just
like their aligned counterparts, and ReadU right-aligns the result,
just as ReadB, ReadW, and ReadL do.
WriteU must handle the memory read-modify-write sequence. However,
it defers register and IO space to model-specific unaligned handlers.
void WriteU (uint32 pa, int32 lnt, int32 val)
{
if (ADDR_IS_MEM (pa)) {
int32 bo = pa & 3;
int32 sc = bo << 3;
M[pa >> 2] = (M[pa >> 2] & ~(insert[len] << sc) | (val << sc);
}
else if ADDR_IS_IO (pa)
WriteIOU (pa, lnt, val);
else WriteRegU (pa, lnt, val);
return;
}
--------------
For the 11/780, ReadIOU, ReadRegU, WriteIOU, and WriteRegU all do the
same thing: they throw an SBI machine check. We can write explicit
routines to do this (and remove the unaligned checks from all the
normal adapter flows), or leave things as they are and simply define
the four routines as macros that go to the normal routines. So there's
very little to do.
On CVAX, I suspect that ReadRegU and WriteRegU behave like the
normal routines. The CVAX specs don't say much, but CMCTL (the memory
controller) notes that it ignores the byte mask and treats every
access as an aligned longword access. I suspect this is true for
the other CVAX support chips, but I no longer have chip specs.
The Qbus, on the other hand... that's a fun one. Note that all of
these cases are presented to the existing aligned IO routine:
bo = 0, byte, word, or longword length
bo = 2, word
bo = 1, 2, 3, byte length
All the other cases are going to end up at ReadIOU and WriteIOU,
and they must turn the request into the exactly correct number of
Qbus accesses AND NO MORE, because Qbus reads can have side-effects,
and word read-modify-write is NOT the same as a byte write.
The read cases are:
bo = 0, byte or word - read one word
bo = 1, byte - read one word
bo = 2, byte or word - read one word
bo = 3, byte - read one word
bo = 0, triword - read two words
bo = 1, word or triword - read two words
ReadIOU is very similar to the existing ReadIO:
int32 ReadIOU (uint32 pa, int32 lnt)
{
int32 iod;
iod = ReadQb (pa); /* wd from Qbus */
if ((lnt + (pa & 1)) <= 2) /* byte or word & even */
iod = iod << ((pa & 2)? 16: 0); /* one op */
else iod = (ReadQb (pa + 2) << 16) | iod; /* two ops, get 2nd wd */
SET_IRQL;
return iod;
}
The write cases are:
bo = x, lnt = byte - write one byte
bo = 0 or 2, lnt = word - write one word
bo = 1, lnt = word - write two bytes
bo = 0, lnt = triword - write word, byte
bo = 1, lnt = triword - write byte, word
WriteIOU is similar to the existing WriteIO:
void WriteIO (uint32 pa, int32 val, int32 lnt)
{
switch (lnt) {
case L_BYTE: /* byte */
WriteQb (pa, val & BMASK, WRITEB);
break;
case L_WORD: /* word */
if (pa & 1) { /* odd addr? */
WriteQb (pa, val & BMASK, WRITEB);
WriteQb (pa + 1, (val >> 8) & BMASK, WRITEB);
}
else WriteQb (pa, val, WRITE);
break;
case 3: /* triword */
if (pa & 1) { /* odd addr? */
WriteQb (pa, val & BMASK, WRITEB);
WriteQb (pa + 1, (val >> 8) & WMASK, WRITE);
}
else {
WriteQb (pa, val & WMASK, WRITE);
WriteQb (pa + 2, (val >> 16) & BMASK, WRITEB);
}
break;
}
SET_IRQL;
return;
}
-----------------
I think this handles all the cases.
/Bob Supnik
Conflicts:
VAX/vax780_defs.h
VAX/vax_mmu.c
VAX/vaxmod_defs.h
The supported boot options now are:
B XQ ; Network boot
B XQA ; equivalent
B XQA0 ; equivalent
B RQ ; Boot RQ0
B RQ0 ; equivalent
B DUA ; equivalent
B DUA0 ; equivalent
B RQn ; Boot RQn
B DUAn ; equivalent
B DUn ; equivalent
B ; Boot using boot ROM device search
Also the R5 boot options can be specified either before or after the device name and with or without the R5:
For example:
B /R5:1 XQ
B /1 XQ
B XQ /R5:1
B XQ/1
are all equivalent
scp.c,scp.h - Gave priority to a command message handler to determine what values result in displayed messages and exported run_cmd_message for use by simulators which add simulator specific BOOT commands which leverage the run_cmd logic and should also leverage the run_cmd_message for message display
VAX/vax610_sysdev.c, vax730_sys.c, vax750_cmi.c, vax780_sbi.c - Added BOOT command message dispatch to run_cmd_message for simulators which perform preprocessing on BOOT activities but otherwise then dispatch to run_cmd.
